SPECIFIC FEATURES IN ASSESSING VULNERABILITY OF BUILDINGS UPON FLOODS

V. N. Burova

Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulanskii per. 13, str.2, Moscow, 101000 Russia

E-mail: valentina_burova@mail.ru

Поступила в редакцию 13.07.2021 г.
После доработки 27.07.2021 г.
Принята к публикации 30.07.2021 г.

The paper considers and analyzes the main directions in investigation as well as the regulatory and methodological documents related to assessing the consequences of floods. Supplements are proposed to the principal commonly recognized classification of flood consequences for various types of buildings.  The approaches are developed to assessing the vulnerability of engineering structures (buildings) to floods based on the use of data on changes in the book value of an object when its physical condition changes due to the water impact. For seven different types of buildings, vulnerability diagrams were built for different flood intensity parameters. These diagrams are mainly intended for indicative and general estimates of possible losses from floods. The developed approaches to vulnerability assessment appear to be universal, quick and easily available.

Keywords: floods, vulnerability, intensity parameters, degree of deformation (destruction), the ratio of intensity parameters to the degree of vulnerability

REFERENCES

1. Alekseevskii, N.I., Magritskii, D.V., Koltermann, P.K., et al. Navodneniya na Chernomorskom poberezh’e Krasnodarskogo kraya [Floods on the Black Sea coast of the Krasnodar krai]. Water resources, 2016, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3-17. (in Russian)
2. Baburin, V.L., Goryachko, M.D., Zemtsov, S.P., et al. Otsenka sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh riskov i ushcherbov ot opasnykh gidrologicheskikh yavlenii (na primere Slavyanskogo raiona Krasnodarskogo kraia) [Assessment of socio-economic risks and damages from dangerous hydrological phenomena (by the example of the Slavyansky district of the Krasnodar krai)]. Georisk, 2015, no. 3, pp. 45-53. (in Russian)
3. Bondarev, V.P., Bolkhovitinova, Yu.A. Sotsial’nye posledstviya katastroficheskikh navodnenii [Social consequences of catastrophic floods]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universtita. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 2019, no. 5, pp. 21-29. (in Russian)
4. Gladkevich, G.I., Terskii, P.N., Frolova, N.L. Otsenka opasnosti navodnenii na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Assessment of flood hazard on the territory of the Russian Federation]. Vodnoe khozyaistvo Rossii, 2012, no. 2, pp. 29-45. (in Russian)
5. Malik, L.K. Faktory riska povrezhdeniya gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzhenii. Problemy bezopasnosti [Risk factors for damage to hydraulic structures. Security problems]. Moscow, Nauka, 2005, 354 p. (in Russian)
6. Padalko, Yu.A. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya uyazvimost’ naseleniya i khozyaistva regionov Rossiiskoi chasti basseina r. Ural ot navodnenii [Socio-economic vulnerability of the population and economy of the regions of the Russian part of the Ural River basin from floods]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. Nauki o Zemle, 2016, no. 12, pp. 439-444. (in Russian)
7. Pechenin, S.A., Rozov, A.L. Novokshenov, L.V. Metodika otsenki ushcherba pri navodneniyakh [Methodology for assessing damage during floods]. St. Petersburg, V/ch 70170, 1992. (in Russian)
8. Ekstremal’nye gidrologicheskie situatsii [Extreme hydrological situations]. N.I. Koronkevich, E.A. Barabanova, I.S. Zaitseva, Eds. Moscow, Media-PRESS Publ., 2010, 464 p. (in Russian)
9. Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Parajka, J., et al. Changing climate shifts timing of European floods. Science, 2017, vol. 357, no. 6351, pp. 588–590.
10. Box, P., Bird, D., Haynes, K., King, D. Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Natural Hazards, 2016, vol. 81(3), pp. 1549–1568.
11. Frolova, N.L., Kireeva, M.B., Magritсkiy, D.V. et al. Hydrological hazards in Russia: origin, classification, changes and risk assessment. Natural Hazards, 2017, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 103–131.