ГЕОЭКОЛОГИЯ


ИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ ГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГИДРОГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГЕОКРИОЛОГИЯ

Geoekologiya, 2020, Vol. 2, 16-27

SOME ASPECTS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SEISMIC IMPACTS
ON THE SLOPE STABILITY (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEVELOPED COASTAL ZONE IN THE WEST CAUCASUS)

M. P. Kropotkin#

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoe shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337 Russia #e-mail: singeos@narod.ru

Some aspects of seismic impact on the stability of massive seismic gravitational solid massives are examined. The case of the slope stability calculation using separate accounting for seismic accelerations in blocks is shown. The influence of the relief on the change in seismic effects is considered. The comparative impact of longitudinal and transverse seismic waves from the earthquake focuses located in front of the slope foot and behind the slope ridge is evaluated. Some interrelations between the impact parameters caused by the seismic waves from the possible earthquake source and the slope stability are analyzed in dependence of the spatial position of seismic sources and landslide-prone sites. It is concluded that the hazard of major seismic impacts of longitudinal waves on slope stability is small, whereas the probability of transverse waves impact is, on the contrary, high.

Keywords: the Black Sea, coast, earthquakes, rock landslides, slope stability calculations

DOI: 10.31857/S086978092002006X

REFERENCES

1. Zaalishvili, V.B. Seismicheskoe mikroraionirovanie territorii gorodov, naselennykh punktov i bol’shikh stroitel’nykh ploshchadok [Seismic microzoning of urban and construction site territories]. Nikolaev, А.V., Editor. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, 350 p. (in Russian) 


2. Kalinin, E.V. Inzhenerno-geologicheskie raschety i modelirovanie [Engineering geological calculations and modeling]. Мoscow, MSU Publ., 2006, 256 p. (in Russian) 


3. Kan, K., Zerkal’, O.V., Lyu, Ts. A comparative analysis of the accounting for seismic effects in the quantitative assessment of slope stability in Russia, China and Europe. Perspektivy razvitiya inzhenernykh izyskanii v stroitel’stve v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: XIII Obshcheross. nauchnoprakt. Konferentciya iI vystavka (29.11–01.12.2017, g. Moskva) [Prospects for the development of engineering surveys in construction in the Russian Federation: XIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference and Exhibition (29.11– 01.12.2017, Moscow). Moscow, Geomarketing Publ., 2017, pp. 533–540. (in Russian) 


4. Kan, K., Zerkal’, O.V., Fomenko, I.K., Ponomarev, A.A. Sovremennye podkhody k kolichestvennoi otsenke ustoichivosti sklonov pri seismicheskom vozdeistvii [Modern approaches to the quantitative assessment of slope stability under seismic conditions]. Inzhen- ernaya geologiya, 2018, no. 1–2, pp. 72–85. (in Rus- sian) 


5. Kropotkin, M.P. Raschety ustoichivosti sklonov i ot- kosov s ispol’zovaniem algoritmov minimizatsii koef- fitsienta ustoichivosti [Slope stability calculations based on algorithms of minimization of the stability coefficient]. Inzhenernye izyskaniya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 20–30. (in Russian) 


6. Nazimova, A.D., Gavrilov, A.V., Kalinin, E.V., Bershov, A.V. Otsenka vliyaniya komponentov inzhenerno-geologicheskikh uslovii yuzhnogo sklona khrebta Psekhako (Krasnodarskii krai) pri seismomikroraion- irovanii s uchetom tekhnogennykh preobrazonanii [Estimation of the influence of engineering geological components of the southern slope of the Psekhako ridge (Krasnodar region) in seismic microzoning considering technological changes]. Inzhenernaya geologiya, 2016, no. 5, pp. 32–38. (in Russian)

7. Nesmeyanov, S.A. Shovnye zony kak verkhnekorovye seismogeneriruyushchie struktury [Suture zones as the upper crust seismogenerating structures]. Geoe- kologiya, 2012, no.1, pp. 5–28. (in Russian)

8. Ostrovskii, A.B. Paleoseismotectonic dislocation on Black Sea Coast of the North-Western Caucasus in relation to the modern estimation of the seismic hazard. Kompleksnye issledovaniya Chernomorskoi vpadiny [Complex investigation of the Black Sea ba- sin]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, pp. 46–58. (in Russian)

9. Pavlenko, О.V. Seismicheskie volny v gruntovykh sloyakh: nelineinoe povedenie grunta pri sil’nykh zem- letryaseniyakh poslednikh let [Seismic waves in ground layers: nonlinear behavior of soils upon re- cent strong earthquakes]. Мoscow, Nauchnyi mir Publ., 2009, 260 p. (in Russian)

10. Popkov, V.I., Kritskaya, O.Yu., Ostapenko, A.A. Seismogravitational deformations and estimation of seismic hazard of southern slope of the North-West- ern Caucasus. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoi seis- mologii: Sb.dokl. Mezhdunar.konferentsii, posv.50-le- tiyu Instituta seismologii im. G.A. Mavlyanova AN RUz [ Urgent problems in modern seismology: Proc. In- tern. Conf. devoted to the 50th anniversary of G.A. Mavlyanov Institute of Seismology, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, October 12–14, 2016, Tashkent, Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, 2016, pp. 452–456. (in Russian)

11. Rogozhin, E.A., Ovsyuchenko, A.N., Lutikov, A.I., Sobisevich, A.L., Sobisevich, L.E., Gorbatikov, А.В. Endogennye opasnosti Bol’shogo Kavkaza [Endoge nous hazards of the Greater Caucasus]. Мoscow, IFZ RAN, 2014, 256 p. (in Russian)

12. Trifonov, B.A., Sevost’yanov, V.V. Osobennosti pro- vedeniya seismicheskogo mikroraionirovaniya na ur- banizirovannoi territorii morskogo poberezh’ya g. Ge- lendzhika pri vysotnom stroitel’stve [Peculiarities of seismic microzoning at the urbanized territory of Gelendzhik sea coast upon high-rise construction]. Inzhenernye izyskaniya, 2018, vol. XII, no. 5–6, pp. 82–90. (in Russian)

13. Khromovskikh, V.S., Nikonov, A.A. Po sledam sil’nykh zemletryasenii [Tracing strong earthquakes]. Мoscow, Nauka, 1984, 144 p. (in Russian)

14. Bard, P.-Y. Effects of surface geology on ground mo- tion: Recent results and remaining issues. Proc. of the

10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineer- ing. Duma, Rotterdam, Balkema Publ., 1995, pp. 305– 324.

15. Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN). Euro- code 8, design of structures for earthquakes resistance. Part 5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. European standard NF EN 1998-5. Brus- sels. Belgium, 2014.

16. Geli, L., Bard, P.-Y., Jullien, B. The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: A review and new results. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 1988, pp. 42–63.

17. Hoek, E. Putting Numbers to Geology: An Engineer’s Viewpoint. Felsbau Rock and Soil Engineering, 1999, no. 3, pp.139–151.