METHODOLOGICAL GROUNDS FOR CALCULATING THE BIOPOSITIVITY OF OBJECTS OF THE ROAD TRANSPORTATION COMPLEX

N.I. Shestakov ^1,*, K.L. Chertes ^2,**

¹National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering,
Yaroslavskoe shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337 Russia

²Samara State Technical University, ul. Molodogvardeyskaya, 244, Samara, 443100 Russia

*E-mail: SHestakovNI@mgsu.ru
** E-mail: chertes2007@yandex.ru

The choice of engineering structures used in road construction requires not only a feasibility study, but it also must contain environmental parameters about the impact on the environment. The article considers the fundamental possibility of using the hierarchy analysis method to evaluate the numerical parameter of biopositivity when choosing the type of road pavement construction. As an example for the calculation, the variants of structures with or without reinforcing meshes in various geological conditions are presented. The method of pair comparison is used to calculate the parameters of biopositivity according to the selected criteria with the establishment of the weight of each of them. According to the obtained values, a graphical interpretation of the results obtained and a summary table of estimated indicators are presented. Using the presented methodology, it becomes possible to evaluate the biopositivity indicator in a comprehensive manner and to use it when justifying the choice of road construction complex structures.

Keywords: biopositivity, criteria, hierarchy analysis method, global impact, highways, pavement construction, reinforcing mesh

REFERENCES

1. Zaikanova I.N. Osnovnye printsipy sravnitel'nogo analiza geosistem dlya geoekologicheskoi otsenki regionov [The basic principles of the comparative analysis of geosystems for the geoecological assessment of regions]. Geoekologiya, 2015, no. 6, pp. 561-568. (in Russian)
2. Kokodeeva, N.E., Andronov, S.Yu., Malyshev, E.V., Mel'nikov, M.I. Primenenie geosinteticheskikh materialov pri armirovanii asfal'tobetonnykh sloev dorozhnoi odezhdy [The use of geosynthetic materials in the reinforcement of asphalt concrete layers of pavement]. Dorogi: Innovatsii v stroitel'stve, 2016, no. 51, pp. 36-42. (in Russian)
3. Naumov, A.E., Ivanov, A.V., Kunnuev, Yu.Sh. Modeli programmnykh reshenii pri upravlenii razvitiem gorodskogo khozyaistva v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Models of software solutions in the management of urban development under uncertainty]. Nedvizhimost': ekonomika, upravlenie. 2016, no. 2, pp. 51-58. (in Russian)
4. Pugin, K.G., Pugina, V.K. Ispol'zovanie otkhodov v strukture organomineral'nykh kompozitov, primenyaemykh dlya stroitel'stva avtomobil'nykh dorog [The use of waste in the structure of organomineral composites used for the construction of highways]. Transport. Transportnye sooruzheniya. Ekologiya, 2021, no. 2, pp. 38-46. (in Russian)
5. Saati, T. Prinyatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii [Decision-making. Hierarchy analysis method]. Moscow, Radio i svyaz' Publ., 1993. (in Russian)
6. Saati, T., Kerns, K. Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizatsiya system [Analytical planning. Organization of systems]. Moscow, Radio i svyaz' Publ., 1991. (in Russian)
7. Finogenko, I.A., D'yakovich, M.P. Metod analiza ierarkhii i postroenie integral'nykh pokazatelei slozhnykh sistem [The method of hierarchy analysis and the construction of integral indicators of complex systems]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2017, vol. 22, no. 6-1, pp. 1335-1340. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-6-1335-1340. (in Russian)
8. Yuganova, T.I. Vybor uchastkov dlya razmeshcheniya ob'ektov obrashcheniya s otkhodami na osnove metodov mnogokriterial'nogo prinyatiya reshenii [Selection of sites for the placement of waste management facilities based on multi-criteria decision-making methods]. Geoekologiya, 2019, no. 4, pp. 79-93. DOI: 10.31857/S0869-78092019479-93.(in Russian)
9. Blanc, M., Thorel L., Girout R., Almeida M. Geosynthetic reinforcement of a granular load transfer platform above rigid inclusions: comparison between centrifuge testing and analytical modelling, Geosynthetics International, 2014, vol. 21(1), pp. 37–52. DOI: 10.1680/gein.13.00033
10. Correia, N.S., Zornberg, J.G. Mechanical response of flexible pavements enhanced with geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays. Geosynthetics International, 2016, vol. 23(3), pp. 83–193. DOI: 10.1680/jgein.15.00041.
11. Saaty, T.L., Tran, L.T. Fuzzy judgments and fuzzy sets. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23-40.
12. Titarenko, B., Titov, S., Titarenko, R. Performance measurement system for multi-project engineering company. PM World Journal, 2015, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1-14.
13. https://superdecisions.com/downloads/index.php?section=win3_0_beta