SELECTION OF SITES FOR ALLOCATION OF WASTE DISPOSAL OBJECTS
BASED ON THE MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS
© 2019 T. I. Yuganova^1,*
1Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Ulanskii per., 13, str. 2, Moscow, 101000 Russia
^*E-mail: tigryu@gmail.com

The problem of allocation of solid municipal waste (SMW) disposal objects is extremely acute for Russia. The complexity of such tasks is primarily due to their interdisciplinarity, i.e., a significant amount of social, economic and technical data and environmental information to be taken into account. In many countries, multi-criteria methods have been used for this purpose, which have proved their effectiveness, making it possible to work out a compromise and objective solution. The methods of T.L. Saaty - analysis of hierarchies (AHP) - and analysis of networks (ANP) are consid­ered, as well as the examples of their use for choosing sites for landfills and waste incinerator plants.

Keywords: MSW, waste disposal, site selection, multi-criteria methods, AHP, ANP.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-78092019479-93

REFERENCES

1.Ortskhanov, T.A. Gradostroitelnye aspekty, napravlennye na obespechenie ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti territorii razmeshcheniya poligonov TBO [Town planning aspects aimed at ensuring the environmental safety of the MSW location territories]. Akademiya. Arkhitektu- ra i stroitelstvo, 2010, no. 3, pp. 150—153. (in Russian).

2. Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, vol. 48, pp. 9—26.

3. Saaty, T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback. The Analytic Network Process. RWS Pub­lications, 1996.

4. Alanbari, M.A., Al-Ansari, N., Jasim, H.K. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for landfill site selec­tion in Al-Hashimyah Qadaa. Natural Science, 2014, vol. 6, pp. 282-304.

5. Aragones-Beltran, P., Pastor-Ferrandoa, J.P., Garcia- Garcia, F., Pascual-Agullo, A. An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, no. 91, pp. 1071-1086.

6. Aydi, A., Zairi, M., Dhia, H.B. Minimization of en­vironmental risk of landfill site using fuzzy logic, an­alytical hierarchy process, and weighted linear com­bination methodology in a geographic information system environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1375-1389.

7. Bottero, M., Ferretti, V. An Analytic Network Pro­cess-based approach for location problems: The case of a new waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy). Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2011, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 63-84.

8. Chang, N.-B., Parvathinathan, G., Breeden, J.B. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria deci­sion-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 139-153.

9. Coelho, L.M.G., Lange, L.C., Coelho, H.M.G. Mul­ti-criteria decision making to support waste manage­ment: A critical review of current practices and meth­ods. Waste Management & Research, 2017, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3-28.

10. Djokanovic, S., Abolmasov, B., Jevremovic, D. GIS application for landfill site selection: a case study in Pancevo, Serbia. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment, 2016, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1273-1299.

11. Eskandari, M., Homaee, M., Mahmoodi, S., Pazira, E., Van Genuchten, M.Th. Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ­mental Science & Pollution Research, 2015, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 7754-7765.

12. Ferretti, V., Pomarico, S. Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for sit­ing a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Tori­no (Italy). Environment Development & Sustainability, 2012, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 843-867.

13. Haruna, R.L., Alaga, T.A, Gajere, E.N, Chioma, U., Amos, S.I. Landfill site selection for solid waste man­agement in Karu Lga, Nasarawa state, Nigeria. Inter­national Journal of Trend in Research & Development, 2016, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 436-467.

14. Josimovic, B., Maric, I. Methodology for the regional landfill site selection. Sustainable Development — Au­thoritative and Leading Edge Content for Environmental Management. S. Curkovic, Ed. IntechOpen, 2012, pp. 513-538. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/38102/In- Tech-Methodology_for_the_regional_landfill_site_ selection.pdf (accessed 09.01.2019).

15. Kaoutar, B., Lahcen, B. A decision support approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill case study Tangier Morocco. International Journal of Engineering Research & Applications (IJERA), 2012, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1676-1684.

16. Kara, C., Doratli, N. Application of GIS/AHP in siting sanitary landfill: a case study in Northern Cy­prus. Waste Management & Research, 2012, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 966-980.

17. Kharat, M.G., Kamble, S.J., Raut, R.D., Kamble, S.S., Dhume, S.M. Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Mode­ling Earth Systems & Environment, 2016, vol. 2, no. 2, article 53, 16 p.

18. Kontos, T.D., Komilis, D.P., Halvadakis, C.P. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Management, 2005, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 818-832.

19. Motlagh, Z.K., Sayadi, M.H. Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (Case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Management, vol. 46, pp. 322-337.

20. Nas, B., Cay, T., Iscan, F., Berktay, A. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2010, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 491-500.

21. Norese, M.F. ELECTRE III as a support for par­ticipatory decision-making on the localization of waste-treatment plans. Land Use Policy, 2006, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 76-85.

22. Poorna, A.C., Vinod, P.G. Solid waste disposal site selection by data analysis using GIS and Remote sensing tools: A case study in Thiruvananthapuram corporation area. International Journal of Geomatics & Geosciences, 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1734-1747.

23. Russo R. de F.S.M., Camanho R. Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, vol. 55, pp. 1123-1132.

24. Saaty, T.L., Tran, L.T. Fuzzy judgments and fuzzy sets. International Journal of Strategic Decision Scienc­es, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23-40.

25. SuperDecisions / Expert Choice. https://superdeci- sions.com/ (accessed 09.01.2019).

26. Tuzkaya, G., Onut, S, Tuzkaya, U.R., Gulsun, B. An analytic network process approach for locating unde­sirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 970-983.

27. Zhu, K.-Y., Yang, S.-L. Research review on Saaty's comments on fuzzy logic is not applicable to analytic hierarchy process. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian / System Engineering Theory & Practice, 2014, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 197-206. https://www.researchgate.net/pub-lication/287315353_Research_review_on_Saaty%27s_ comments_on_fuzzy_logic_is_not_applicable
_to_an- alytic_hierarchy_process (accessed 09.01.2019).