ГЕОЭКОЛОГИЯ


ИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ ГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГИДРОГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГЕОКРИОЛОГИЯ

Geoekologiya, 2020, Vol. 5, P. 3-23

METHODOLOGY OF ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE. CONCEPTUAL ISSUES AND EXAMPLES OF APPLICATION

T. I. Yuganova1,*

Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience RAS (IEG RAS) Ulansky per. 13, bld. 2, Moscow, 101000
*E-mail: tigryu@gmail.com

The review considers the methodology for assessing the life cycle of solid municipal waste from the standpoint of environmental protection, which is widely used in many countries, but almost not in Russia. The basic concepts of the methodology are presented, i.e., the life cycle scenario and its steps, assessment stages, impact categories and their indicators, functional unit, etc. The problem of weighting categories and its subjectivity is separately considered. An example of the applying life-cycle assessment (LCA) in Russia to estimation of the potential environmental impact of developed waste disposal scenarios for the city of Irkutsk is presented. Among foreign studies, several reviews of LCA applications have been noted. Frequently used software products are indicated. A number of available publications are presented on the specific experience of applying the LCA methodology, where more or less complete scenarios were studied, indicating the steps considered, the categories of impact and the detail of the results. Some of these studies are described. One of the last steps of the waste life cycle is considered separately – the environmental impact of the closed MSW landfill, in particular, the duration of the impact, which is recommended to be considered in the LCA. A study simulating the ingress of pollutants with leachate over a period of 10,000 years is presented under various scenarios of servicing the landfill with LCA by toxicity and eutrophication categories is presented, and the advantage of this approach over the usual assessment of the risk of groundwater pollution is shown. 

Key words: MSW, waste life cycle, waste life cycle assessment (waste LCA), scenario, LCA stage, inventory analysis, impact assessment, impact category, impact category indicator, characterization, weighting, subjectivity, functional unit, closed landfill

REFERENCES

  1. Osipov V.I. Upravleniye tverdymi kommunalnymi otkhodami kak federalnyi ekologicheskii proekt [Management of solid municipal waste as the federal ecological project]. Geoekologiya, 2019, no. 3, pp. 3–11. (in Russian)
  2. Saati T. Prinyatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarxij / Per. s angl. R.G. Vachnadze [Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process]. Moscow, “Radio i svyaz`” Publ., 1993, 278 p. (in Russian)
  3. Slyusar N.N., Vajsman Ya.I., Korotaev V.N. Ocenka dolgosrochnyh emissij ob"ektov zahoroneniya tverdyh kommunal’nyh othodov: rezul’taty polevyh issledovanij i laboratornogo modelirovaniya [The estimation of long-term emissions from municipal solid waste landfill-sites: the results of field studies and laboratory modeling]. Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii, 2016, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 32–39. (in Russian)
  4. Tulokhonova A.V., Ulanova O.V. Ocenka zhiznennogo cikla integrirovanny`x sistem upravleniya otxodami [Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems]. Moscow, Academy of Natural Sciences, 2013. Available at: URL: https://www.monographies.ru/ru/book/view?id=267 (accessed 19.05.2020). (in Russian)
  5. Ulanova O.V., Starostina V.Yu. Kratkij obzor metoda ocenki zhiznennogo cikla produkcii i sistem upravleniya otxodami [A brief overview of the product life cycle assessment methodology and waste management systems]. Sovremenny`e problemy` nauki i obrazovaniya, 2012, no. 4. Available at: URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=6799 (accessed 19.05.2020). (in Russian)
  6. Abeliotis K. Life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management. Integrated Waste Management. Vol. 1. / S. Kumar, ed. InTech, 2011, pp. 465–482. Available at: URL: https://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-wastemanagement-volume-i/life-cycle-assessment-in-municipal-solid-waste-management (accessed 19.05.2020).
  7. Ahlroth S., Nilsson M., Finnveden G., Hjelm O., Hochschorner E. Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools – suggestions for further developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, vol. 19, no. 2–3, pp. 145–156.
  8. Banar M., Cokaygil Z., Ozkan A. Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkeyn. Waste Management, 2009, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 54–62.
  9. Bhander G.S., Christensen T.H., Hauschild M.Z. EASEWASTE – life cycle modeling capabilities for waste management technologies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 403–416.
  10. Boer J., Boer E., Jager J. LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems. Waste Management, 2007, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1032–1045.
  11. Bovea M.D., Ibáñez-Forés V., Gallardo A., ColomerMendoza F.J. Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study. Waste Management, 2010, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2383–2395.
  12. Chen X. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Five Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems (MSWMS): A Case Study of Nanjing, China: Thesis of Master of Science. University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park. UK, 2012, 48 p. Available at: URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ff80/a0fd04868b9cdcadcac48bcc31fcb6fd3951.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  13. Cleary J. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: A comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environment International, 2009, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1256–1266.
  14. CML-IA Characterisation Factors. Available at: URL: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/researchoutput/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors (accessed 19.05.2020).
  15. Cremiato R., Mastellone M.L., Tagliaferri C., Zaccariello L., Lettieri P. Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production. Renewable Energy, 2018, vol. 124, pp. 180–188.
  16. The Eco-indicator 95. Weighting method for environmental effects that damage ecosystems or human health on a European scale: Final Report / M. Goedkoop; PRé Consultants, DUIJF Consultancy BV. Netherlands, 1995, 89 p. Available at: URL: https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/EI95- FinalReport.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  17. The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Methodology Annex; Third edition / M. Goedkoop, R. Spriensma; PRé Consultants B.V, 2001, 87 p. Available at: URL: https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  18. Ecoinvent. Available at: URL: https://www.ecoinvent.org/home.html (accessed 19.05.2020).
  19. Finnveden G. Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 1999, vol. 26, no. 3–4, pp. 173–187.
  20. Finnveden G., Hauschild M.Z., Ekvall T., Guinée J., Heijungs R., Hellweg S., Koehler A., Pennington D., Suh S. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
  21. GaBi Database & Modelling Principles, 2017, 194 p. Available at: URL: https://www.gabi-software.com/fileadmin/GaBi_Databases/GaBi_Modelling_Principles_2017.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  22. International Standard ISO 14040 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework: Second edition 2006-07-01, 2006. 26 p. Available at: http://www.cscses.com/uploads/2016328/20160328110518251825.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  23. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro / PRé; M. Goedkoop, M. Oele, J. Leijting, T. Ponsioen, E. Meijer. 2016, 80 p. Available at: URL: https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/SimaPro8IntroductionToLCA.pdf (accessed 19.05.2020).
  24. Kaazke J., Meneses M., Wilke B.-M., Rotter V.S. Environmental evaluation of waste treatment scenarios for the towns Khanty-Mansiysk and Surgut, Russia. Waste Management & Research, 2013, vol. 31, no. 3. pp. 315–326.
  25. Khandelwal H., Dhar H., Thalla A.K., Kumar S. Application of life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management: A worldwide critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 209, pp. 630–654.
  26. Kjeldsen P., Barlaz M.A., Rooker A.P., Baun A., Ledin A., Christensen T.H. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 297–336.
  27. Kulczycka J., Lelek Ł., Lewandowska A., Zarebska J. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management – comparison of results using different LCA models. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2015, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 125–140.
  28. Liikanen M., Havukainen J., Viana E., Horttanainen M. Steps towards more environmentally sustainable municipal solid waste management – A life cycle assessment study of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 196, pp. 150–162.
  29. Obersteiner G., Binner E., Mostbauer P., Salhofer S. Landfill modelling in LCA – A contribution based on empirical data. Waste Management, 2007, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. S58–S74.
  30. Ogundipe F.O., Jimoh O.D. Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2015, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1305–1314.
  31. Özeler D., Yetiş Ü., Demirer G.N. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. Environment International, 2006, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 405–411.
  32. Parkes O., Lettieri P., Bogle I.D.L. Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park. Waste Management, 2015, vol. 40, pp. 157–166.
  33. Ripa M., Fiorentino G., Vacca V., Ulgiati S. The relevance of site-specific data in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The case of the municipal solid waste management in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 142, Part 1, pp. 445–460.
  34. Ripaldi G. Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Management System. The case of Avezzano, Italy: Master of Science Thesis. Stockholm, 2015, 124 p. Available at: URL: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/79534/GloriaRipaldiFialDraft.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 19.05.2020).
  35. Rodríguez-Iglesias J., Marañón E., Castrillón L., Riestra R., Sastre H. Life cycle analysis of municipal solid waste management possibilities in Asturias, Spain. Waste Management & Research, 2003, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 535–548.
  36. SuperDecisions / Expert Choice. Available at: URL: https://superdecisions.com/ (accessed 19.05.2020).
  37. Turner D.A., Beaven R.P., Woodman N.D. Evaluating landfill aftercare strategies: A life cycle assessment approach. Waste Management, 2017, vol. 63, pp. 417–431.
  38. Yay A.S.E. Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, vol. 94, pp. 284–293.
  39. Zhao Y., Wang H.-T., Lu W.-J., Damgaard A., Christensen T.H. Life cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system in Hangzhou, China (EASEWASTE). Waste Management & Research, 2009, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 399–406.