ГЕОЭКОЛОГИЯ


ИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ ГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГИДРОГЕОЛОГИЯ. ГЕОКРИОЛОГИЯ

Geoekologiya, 2018, Vol. 6, P. 31-40

CONDITIONS OF GROUNDWATER LEVEL VARIATION IN THE UPPER HYDRODYNAMIC ZONE IN TOMSK REGION

O. G. Savicheva,#, V. A. L’gotinb,##, and Yu. A. Moiseevaa,###

a National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, pr.Lenina 30, Tomsk, 634050 Russia b Siberian Regional Center for State Geological Monitoring”, Gidrospetzgeologiya branch, ul. Nikitina 99, Tomsk, 634061 Russia

# E-mail: OSavichev@mail.ru
## E-mail: mail@sfo.geomonitoring.ru
### E-mail: jamoiseeva@mail.ru

Groundwater regime is a key factor to solving different scientific and engineering problems ranging from the long-term prediction of climate and environmental changes to supplying population with drinking water. This determines the continuing relevance for the study of hydrological and hydrogeological conditions, including in the taiga zone of Western Siberia, which is one of the most important oil and gas producing regions of Eurasia. The results obtained by the group of authors (Savichev, Makushin, L’gotin, Shiklomanov et al.), attested to 0.21 m average increase in groundwater levels from Quaternary and Paleogene aquifers in the Tomsk region from the mid –1960s to 2005 without any evident anthropogenic influence. Therefore, the purpose of this article is: 1) supplementing conclusions for a longer series of groundwater-level observations (up to 2015) and the assessment of current hydrogeodynamic regime; 2) identifying causes of the observed changes. As a result of the analysis of long-term hydrogeological data in the territory of the Tomsk region (Western Siberia), it was revealed that after 1994 (compared to the period from the second half of the 1960s to 1994), the groundwater levels of Quaternary and Paleogene aquifers increased by 0.31 m on average. A mathematical model of the yearly distribution of the runoff in the Tym, Ket, Vasyugan, and Chaya rivers (tributaries of the Ob’ River) was developed. It was shown that after 1994 there was a decrease in the iciness of soils in the end of winter, an increase in their humidity in April-May, and an increasing water yield from the snow and rain in April. Under the conditions of excessive moisture, this leads to an outstripping increase in catchments of storage relative to the growth of groundwater runoff and, as a result, to the groundwater level rise.

Keywords: groundwater level rise, upper hydrodynamic zone, water balance, climate change, Western Siberia, Tomsk region

REFERENCES

1. Befani, N.F., Kalinin, G.P. Uprazhneniya i metodiches-kie razrabotki po gidrologicheskim prognozam [Exercises and methodological development on hydrological forecasts]. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1983, 390 p. (in Russian)

2. Vershinina, L.K., Krestovskii, O.I., Kalyuzhnyi, I.L., Pavlova, K.K., Otsenka poter’ talykh vod i prognozy ob’ema stoka polovod’ya [Assessment of meltwater losses and forecasts of flood runoff]. Leningrad, Gidrome-teoizdat, 1985, 189 p. (in Russian)

3. Gelfan, A .N. D inamiko-stokhasticheskoe modelirovanie formirovaniya talogo stoka [Dynamic-stochastic modeling of the melt flow formation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007, 279 p. (in Russian)

4. Gusev, E.M., Nasonova, O.N. Modelirovanie teplo- i vlagoobmena poverkhnosti sushi s atmosferoi [Modeling of heat and moisture exchange of the land surface with the atmosphere]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2010, 327 p. (in Russian)

5. Dzhamalov, R.G., Frolova, N.L., Telegina, E.A. Izme-nenie zimnego stoka rek evropeiskoi chasti Rossii [Change in the winter river runoff of the European part of Rus-sia]. Vodnye resursy. 2015, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 581–588. (in Russian)

6. Dzhamalov, R.G., Safronova, T.I., Telegina, E.A. Vnu-trigodovoe raspredelenie stoka rek s otsenkoi roli zimnei mezheni [Intra-annual distribution of river runoff with the assessment of the role of winter low-water period]. Vodnye resursy, 2017, vol. 42, no 6, pp. 581–588. (in Russian)

7. Doklad ob osobennostyakh klimata na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2016 god [Report on the peculiarities of climate in the territory of the Russian Federation in 2016.]. Moscow, 2017, 70 p. (in Russian)

8. Dyukarev, E .A. P rognoz glubiny promerzaniya pochvy s pomoshch’yu prosteishei regressionnoi modeli [Forecast of the soil freezing depth using the simplest regression model].Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, no. 387, pp. 266–270. (in Russian)

9. Dyukarev, A.G., Pologova, N.N., Lapshina, E.D., Berezin, A.E., Lgotin, V.A., Muldiyarov, E.Ya. Prirod-no-resursnoye raionirovaniye Tomskoi oblasti [Natural-resource zoning of the Tomsk region]. Tomsk: Izd-vo “Spektr” IOA SO RAN. 1997. 40 p. (in Russian)

10. Dyukarev, A.G., L’vov, Yu.A., Khmelev, V.A., et al. Prirodnye resursy Tomskoi oblasti [Natural resources of the Tomsk region] Novosibirsk. Nauka. Sibirskoe ot-delenie, 1991, 176 p. (in Russian)

11. Kalyuzhnyi, I.L., Lavrov, S.A. Mekhanizm vliyaniya glubiny promerzaniya pochv rechnykh basseinov na zimnii stok [The mechanism of the influence of the soil freez-ing depth in river basins on the winter runoff]. Vodnye resursy, 2017, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 442–451. (in Russian)

12. Lgotin, V.A., Savichev, O.G., Makushin, Yu.V. Mnogo-letnie izmeneniya srednesezonnykh i srednegodovykh urovnei i temperatury podzemnykh vod verkhnei gidrodi-namicheskoi zony v Tomskoi oblasti [Long-term changes in average seasonal and annual mean levels and temperature of groundwater in the upper hydrodynamic zone in Tomsk Region] Geoekologiya, 2010, no 1. pp. 23–29. (in Russian)

13. Mezentsev, V.S. Gidrologicheskie raschety v meliora-tivnykh tselyakh [Hydrological calculations for recla-mation purposes]. Omsk. Omskii sel’skokhozyaistven-nyi institut. 1982, 84 p. (in Russian)

14. Moiseeva, Yu.A., Savichev, O.G. Sposob rascheta i voz-mozhnye izmeneniya podzemnogo stoka v Zapadnoi Sibiri v golocene [Changes in groundwater flow in Western Si-beria in Holocene]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhniches-kohgo universiteta, 2017, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 6–14. (in Russian)

15. Motovilov, Yu.G. Gidrologicheskoe modelirovanie rechnykh basseinov v razlichnykh prostranstvennykh masshtabakh 1. Algoritmy generalizatsii i osredneniya [Hydrological modeling of river basins in different spa-tial scales 1. Algorithms of generalization and averag-ing]. Vodnye resursy, 2016, vol. 43, no 3, pp. 243–253. (in Russian)

16. Naidenov, V.I. Nelineinaya dinamika poverkhnostnykh vod sushi [Nonlinear dynamics of surface waters of the land]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004, 318 p. (in Russian)

17. Nepryakhin, E.M. Pochvy Tomskoi oblasti [Soils of Tomsk region]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tom. gos. un-ta, 1977, 437 p. (in Russian)

18. Pologova, N.N., Lapshina, E.D. Nakoplenie ugleroda v torfyanykh zalezhakh Bol’shogo Vasyuganskogo bolota [Accumulation of carbon in peat deposits of the Greater Vasyugan bog]. Bolshoe Vasyuganskoe boloto. Sovremen-noe sostoyanie i protsessy razvitiya [The Greater Vasyu-gan bog. Current state and development processes]. Tomsk. Izd-vo IOA SO RAN, 2002, pp. 174–186. (in Russian)

19. Osnovnye gidrologicheskie kharakteristiki. T. 15. Altai. Zapadnaya Sibir i Severnyi Kazahstan. T. 1. Verkhnyaya i Srednyaya Ob [Basic hydrological characteristics. Vol. 15. Altai. Western Siberia and Northern Kazakh-stan. Vol. 1. The Upper and Middle Ob River]. Lenin-grad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1979, 487 p. (in Russian)

20. Savichev, O.G., Makushin, Yu.V. Mnogoletnie izmeneniya urovnei podzemnykh vod verhnei gidrodinamicheskoi zony na territorii Tomskoi oblasti [Long-term changes in groundwater levels of the upper hydrody-namic zone in the territory of Tomsk region]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2004, vol. 307, no. 4, pp. 60–63. (in Russian)

21. Savichev, O.G. Vodnye resursy Tomskoi oblasti [Water resources of Tomsk region]. Tomsk. Izd-vo Tomsk. politekhn. un-ta, 2010, 248 p. (in Russian)

22. Speranskaya, N.A. Potentsial’no vozmozhnoe i vidimoe isparenie i ego izmeneniya na evropeiskoi chasti Rossii za poslednie 50 let (po eksperimental’nym dannym) [Poten-tially possible and visible evaporation and its changes in the European part of Russia over the past 50 years (ac-cording to experimental data)]. Vodnye resursy, 2016, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 661–672. (in Russian)

23. Sostoyanie geologicheskoi sredy (nedr) territorii Tomskoi oblasti v 2014 g. [State of the geological environment (subsurface) in the Tomsk region in 2014]. Informat-sionnyi byulleten. Vyp. 20. AO “Tomskgeomonitoring”. Tomsk: OOO “D-print”, 2015, 84 p. (in Russian)

24. Sostoyanie geologicheskoi sredy (nedr) territorii Tomskoi oblasti v 2015 g. [State of the geological environment (subsurface) in the Tomsk region in 2015]. Informat-sionnyi byulleten. Vyp. 21. AO “Tomskgeomonitoring”. Tomsk: OOO “D-print”, 2016, 80 p. (in Russian)

25. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop wa-ter requirements – FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Water Resources, Development and Management Service FAO. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organiza-tion of the United Nations, Rome. 1998. 276 p.

26. Hendriks, M.R. Introduction to Physical Hydrology. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press. 2010. 331 p.

27. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. P. I. A discussion of principles. Jour-nal of Hydrology. 1970. Vol. 10. no 3. pp. 282–290.

28. Shiklomanov, A.I., Lammers, R.B., Lettenmaier, D.P., Polischuk, Yu.M., Saviche,v O.G., and Smith, L.G. Hydrological Changes: Historical Analysis, Contem-porary Status, and Future Projections. Environmental Changes in Siberia: Regional Changes and their Global Consequences. Eds. P.Ya. Groisman, G. Gutman. Dordrecht, Springer. 2013. Ch. 4, pp. 111–154.